The Ship of Theseus
What is it?
The Ship of Theseus is a philosophical thought experiment that questions whether a ship that has had all its parts replaced is still the same ship. It raises the question of whether an object can retain its identity even if all its components have been replaced over time.
The Ship of Theseus is a thought experiment from ancient Greek philosophy that explores the concept of identity and change over time. The paradox is named after the mythical Greek hero Theseus and his ship, which was preserved for centuries in his honor.
Imagine Theseus has a ship made of wooden planks. Over time, the wooden planks start to decay, and one by one, they are replaced with new, identical planks. Eventually, all of the original planks have been replaced with new ones. Now, here's the question: Is the ship that exists now, after all the replacements, still the same ship as the original Ship of Theseus, or is it a different ship altogether?
To further complicate matters, imagine that someone collects all the old, decayed planks and uses them to rebuild a ship that looks identical to the original. Now there are two ships: one with all the new planks and one with all the old, decayed planks. Which one is the true Ship of Theseus?
This thought experiment raises questions about the nature of identity and change. If an object undergoes gradual changes, at what point does it cease to be the same object? Does the identity of an object reside in its physical components, its form, or some combination of both?
Here's a simple example: Consider your favorite sweater. Over time, it becomes worn out and develops holes. You mend the holes with patches, and eventually, the entire sweater is covered in patches. Is it still your favorite sweater, or has it become a different sweater altogether?
The Ship of Theseus paradox encourages us to think about the continuity of identity and the nature of change, not only in physical objects but also in ourselves as we grow and evolve throughout our lives. It poses the question of whether our identity remains the same despite the changes we undergo, both physically and mentally.
The Ship of Theseus is a philosophical thought experiment that dates back to the ancient Greek philosopher Plutarch (c. 46-120 CE) in his work "Life of Theseus" (Plutarch, 75 CE). This paradox explores the concept of identity and change over time, raising questions about the persistence of objects and their properties. To understand this paradox, it is important to relate it to other principles and scientific topics, such as the theories of identity, mereology, and cellular regeneration.
The paradox goes as follows: Theseus has a ship made of wooden planks. As the ship ages and the planks decay, they are replaced one by one with new planks. Eventually, all the original planks have been replaced. The question posed is whether the ship with all the new planks is still the same Ship of Theseus or a different ship altogether. This paradox raises questions about the nature of identity, as well as the persistence of objects through change (Plutarch, 75 CE; Van Inwagen, 1990).
There are several theories of identity that can help us understand the Ship of Theseus paradox. Leibniz's Law of the Identity of Indiscernibles (Leibniz, 1686) states that if two objects share all the same properties, they must be the same object. However, in the case of the Ship of Theseus, it is unclear whether the ship with replaced planks shares all the same properties as the original ship. Another approach is the theory of four-dimensionalism, which posits that objects are extended across both space and time, thus having temporal parts (Sider, 2001). According to this view, the Ship of Theseus could be considered the same object across time, despite its changing parts.
Mereology, the study of parts and their relation to the whole, is another area of philosophy that can be applied to the Ship of Theseus paradox (Simons, 1987). Mereological essentialism, for example, argues that an object is identical to the sum of its parts, so the replacement of any part results in a different object (Chisholm, 1973). In contrast, mereological universalism posits that any collection of objects forms a whole, which might suggest that the replaced ship still forms a whole with the original ship (Lewis, 1991).
The paradox can also be related to biological concepts, such as cellular regeneration. Living organisms undergo constant cell turnover, with old cells being replaced by new ones. For instance, human skin cells are replaced approximately every 27 days (Weintraub, 2014). This raises the question of whether a person remains the same individual despite these changes, similar to the Ship of Theseus.
By relating the Ship of Theseus paradox to various theories of identity, such as Leibniz's Law of the Identity of Indiscernibles and four-dimensionalism, we can gain insights into how objects maintain their identity despite changes in their parts. Mereology, the study of the relationships between parts and wholes, offers additional perspectives on the paradox, with concepts like mereological essentialism and universalism providing contrasting viewpoints on the nature of identity.
Connecting the paradox to biological concepts like cellular regeneration highlights its relevance to living organisms, as we must consider whether individuals maintain their identity despite the constant turnover of cells. This connection also raises questions about the criteria for identity, whether it is based on physical continuity, psychological continuity, or some other factor.
The Ship of Theseus paradox serves as a valuable thought experiment, prompting philosophical and scientific inquiry into the nature of identity and the persistence of objects through change. It continues to challenge our understanding of these concepts and provoke meaningful discussion across various disciplines.
In summary, the Ship of Theseus paradox encourages us to explore the nature of identity and the persistence of objects through change. By connecting the paradox to philosophical theories of identity, mereology, and biological concepts like cellular regeneration, we can better understand the complexities of identity and change over time.
References
- Chisholm, R. M. (1973). Parts as essential to their wholes. Review of Metaphysics, 26(4), 581-603.
- Leibniz, G. W. (1686). Discourse on Metaphysics. In Philosophical Essays. Hackett Publishing Company.
- Lewis, D. (1991). Parts of Classes. Blackwell.
- Plutarch (75 CE). Life of Theseus. In Plutarch's Lives. Penguin Classics.
- Sider, T. (2001). Four-dimensionalism: An ontology of persistence and time. Oxford University Press.
- Simons, P. (1987). Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press.
- Van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material Beings. Cornell University Press.